There are many problems with this “campaign” to replace Biden. The potential cost of supporting and building this campaign is so steep, it’s almost insane or suicidal to even think of such a prospect, of waging a war of criticism on the President because of an almost meaningless debate. The criticism only makes Trump more viable (even if a bowl of spaghetti would beat Trump in an election, not supporting Joe Biden is utterly insane, at this point; if he rapes someone, tries to overturn an election, or gets convicted of trying to cover-up his sex with a pornstar to hide said affair from the American people, I’ll reconsider my position on replacing Biden).

Let me start with this problem:

False equivalency and worse: the campaign to replace (CtR) continues to normalize Trump.  He’s not being criticized (enough) for his debate performance, or for the fact THAT HE IS SUCH A PIECE OF SHIT.  Nope.  Biden’s bad performance has eclipsed all of the bullshit that came out of Trump’s pie hole (or all of the other truly dangerous shit attached to the orange candidate).  Not only does this CtR attempt to argue that Biden is unfit for office; it is actually making the case that Trump has more of a right to run for President than Biden does. If you are part of this growing voice of “Replace Biden” bozos, that is what you are arguing.  If you disagree, if you don’t think that’s what you are saying, there’s a reason you think that way: you don’t have a clue what you’re doing or saying. Just STFU.

The fucking New York Times has a slew of articles/columns/etc arguing that Biden should step-down, do the right thing, etc.  What is the rationale here?  What would prompt a major newspaper to bring such a stinging rebuke of a current candidate (the incumbent) for President?  Because he tripped over some lines in a debate? And this only reinforces the point that he’s too old to be President? 

Wouldn’t taking such a stand be more appropriate against a candidate like Donald fucking Trump?  Why hasn’t the New York Times articulated this same kind of veto of the felonious Republican candidate who everyone knows organized the insurrection to overturn the 2020 election, sold top secret documents to foreign powers, and who at this very moment, day-in-and-day-out, continues to sow anti-American sentiment that is destroying this country?  I hear the Epstein logs have been released and Trump is evidenced throughout, but we already know of his pedophilia and rapist qualities. In a way, we already know Trump is guilty of so much disturbing behavior, personally and politically. But why the fuck not report on that shit?  

Why the fuck would a major newspaper advance such a view about one candidate when the other one has been so unfit for office for years?  With all of the streams of evidence, law suits, and common sense to support attacking that mother fucker’s candidacy, why would you go after Joe Biden?  

Should we list all of Joe’s accomplishments, remind everyone of how returning our country to some sense of normalcy has been a giant relief, after several years of that insecure, fraudulent, fucked-up orange son-of-a-bitch running our country into the ground? Isn’t it a relief not to be watching some end-of-reality TV series where people like Bannon, Flynn, Manaforte, Putin and Kim Jong Un are the good guys, the stars?

What the fuck is wrong with everyone?  If you are taking part in this CtR, shame on you.

There’s more . . .