UROC: A Step in a New Direction

GEER 100k Start (same location as UROC) Photo: Charlottesville Track Club

Trail Runner’s Ultra Race of Champions 100k (UROC) is getting a lot of coverage on the interwebs.  Other than a potentially meaningful race in Bend, Oregon this Saturday, specifically the Flagline 50k, picked for the second year in a row as a USATF Trail National Championships, the gathering near Charlottesville, Virginia on Saturday the 24th seems to be on several people’s radar, for several reasons.

Change is major theme in the current trail and ultra running discourse.  This statement might be misleading since people, especially groups and communities of people, are often involved, whether they know it or not, in some phase of their own individual and congregation’s transformation, evolution, renovation, etc.  One can call it whatever she wants: there is always change in the air, and we are definitely talking about more than seasonal change (though that’s a nice metaphor).

One of the big topics of change getting volleyed about in this spirited discourse includes the rise of professionalism in the sport (especially in the American version).  This includes (among other things) the role of sponsorship.  Clearly more money invested in the sport will impact race organization, competition, and the winnings and other bonuses made available to elite athletes.  This professionalism will “enhance” races in other ways, such as media coverage, which can only be good given that more people will “see” the sport, including America’s impressionable youth.  I was telling my friend the other day, “How cool would it be to have your kid want to be the next Scott Jurek.”

Mike Wardian

The Comrades Marathon may be the extreme of this embrace of growth and professionalism in ultra running; look what that could do to the “value” of a race.  Massive media attention, including full television coverage and winnings that reach six-figures mean there is an example we can certainly target for the elite level of competition.  Though sponsorship capital on the European race scene doesn’t seem to reach the levels of Comrades, that off-road running contingent (which really spills into the general population) over there certainly uses another currency that can logically translate into money: Interest.  The well-documented international Team Salomon seems to very much exemplify this kind of change going-on in the sport.

Not having a database of race statistics to pull from, we could still safely say the American ultra sport is growing in interest.  The sheer number of MUT races that meander across the lands is staggering.  Just according to Ultra Running Magazine “There were 554 ultramarathon races held in North America in 2010.”  Of course, what about the number of runners signing-up for these 554+ races?  There are several hundred examples we could cite with a few clicks.  It’s great news.  How can we not see this type of individual and group interest very encouraging?  Furthermore, who doesn’t have an ultra running blog?  This alone may be the best place to look in order to illustrate not just the growth of the sport, but growth’s predecessor (and the point of this paragraph): the interest in the sport.  And it’s some of the discussions on these blogs where one will find so many perfect examples of change bouncing around.

A big discussion for some time has been the need for a true national or even world championship trail/mountain race.  Having thought at length about this topic, talked with many people and read many different perspectives (including trying to find all of the current sanctioned “championships” that exist), this aspiration seems admittedly plagued with difficulty.  Tradition is a very formidable foe to change.  The sport of ultra running is traditionally low-key, and almost uneventful.  The trail racing elite has emerged over the years, but the larger trail community doesn’t necessarily thrive on fierce competition among other runners; it’s not the driving force.  Races are spread-out, happen throughout the year with very little sense of series organization or tournament style (other than a few like the North Face Endurance Challenge and the evolving Montrail((Patagonia?)) Ultra Cup ((?))).  Instead, there are simply some classic races, a few with huge followings; most people are well read on these traditions.  Races more become opportunities to congregate and run together for several hours with the hopes of just finishing (certainly of PRing), of enduring several degrees of fatigue and pain.  Sure, there are different levels of tradition among these hundreds of races and often stemming from these traditions are real races, even among the mid to back of the pack runners.  Be that as it may, as it stands, there is no one race or race series to rule them all. 

One of the best people to ask about this desire for championship race change is Geoff Roes.  The man behind the Alaska Mountain Running Camps has been outspoken on this issue, even writing in January of this year, following his 2010 UROY selection, which he won with the help of winning the hugely traditional Western States 100, “I think the discussion of what effect a true championship race would have on the sport is a moot point. I think that there is such a high demand for this that it is absolutely going to happen within the next couple years. It’s a simple aspect of a free market that when you have a large demand for a product/service that is not available, someone will provide a product/service to fill that void.”  This is a definitive stance on an issue to which many industry folk might balk.  This is pulled from his blog.  The post is brilliantly illustrative of a how one of the top mountain ultra runners in the world feels about the lack of a true MUT national championship.  He literally lays it out in this fiery piece.

Jump ahead to September 21, 2011, on the eve of UROC.  Geoff is preparing to travel to compete in the first running of a race organized to crown a champion ultra runner.  The design follows perhaps that of the North Face Endurance Challenge, which caters, at least more than other “championships,” to the front of the race, the elite runners.  What’s remarkable was how the race has received instant credibility and heavy criticism: the classic mixed response to change.

What is worth pointing-out is Roes’ role in the formation of UROC.  Back in January he wasn’t just talking the talk of change at the championship level.  And remember, this is a guy who has competed in the sport’s most competitive races, namely WS100, several other American classic ultras (Wasatch, Hurt, Bear, Masochist, AR, etc.), including the competitive North Face EC series, culminating in the fiercely competitive San Francisco race.  Come to think of it, perhaps Roes sees the NF EC championship and maybe UTMB as legitimate world championships, but what is still in need is a definitive national championship.  Hence, he helped the organizers of UROC in recruiting the “champions” for the race on Saturday, in effect “designing” a championship race.  What does this mean?  Given the idea that organizing such a race faces a lot of difficulty, given the staunch tradition that defines the sport of ultra running, the problem with finding land and permits with which to facilitate, etc., we have to focus instead on the intent of the race, the fact that Roes has become a true ambassador, even steward, of ultra running (in a previous post we suggested he become the Czar of the sport, seriously).  Because the sport, as he himself argues (in support, referring to several discussions he’s had with several elite ultra runners), needs this change.  This weekend, one could say, is Roes walking the walk.

If the race doesn’t go-off without a hitch, with runners going off-course, with complaints of too much road in a supposed trail championship, with complaints that runners were forced to hurdle Oktoberfest revelers in route to the finish, still we believe that the bigger picture here remains intact, that the sport/community (driven by its leaders and enthusiastic congregation) is in the midst of massive change.  And that Geoff Roes is playing a big part in the positive changes occurring in the sport.  When we asked him about his thoughts of the race just days from the start-line, he told us,

“I think UROC will be really exciting. I have no real expectations or goals for myself but it’ll be fun to see how the race plays out in terms of the kind of interest it gets in the running media/blogosphere. UROC certainly has some kinks to work out (as all new events do for the first few years), but I do think it’s taken a bold step forward that no other ultra races have been interested in or willing to take at this point. That is they were willing to say here’s a race that will have a primary focus on the race at the front of the pack. So much so that they are actively recruiting top-level runners to take part in their event.  To my knowledge they are the only ultra currently doing this. This approach doesn’t appeal to everyone (far from it), but shouldn’t be seen as a problem.  There are so many ultras in the world today, any runner interested in racing should have no trouble finding dozens that appeal to them. The lack of diversity in the style of ultrarunning events is sometimes quite shocking, but I think events like UROC (and other new events that actively do things a bit differently) are helping to create a bit of diversity, and a bit of excitement, in an otherwise very homogeneous sport. This isn’t to say that the style of existing events don’t appeal to me (I wouldn’t have run almost 30 ultras in the last 3 years if I didn’t enjoy the existing events), but at some point many races start to feel like they have been designed to be as much like the typical race as possible. I think the trend in the coming years will be events that actively try to be different than the typical ultra. I think UROC is just one example of this and I think this trend is terribly exciting for the sport.”

Enough said?  Almost.  We just have to highlight the read here on such a seemingly monumental event.  Granted, the race may not be perfect or “appeal  to everyone (far from it),” but when a runner of Geoff’s caliber talks about a the sport being “very homogeneous,” that he is interested in “helping to create a bit of diversity, and a bit of excitement,” that’s compelling.  Hopefully people are thinking big picture here, mind-set, paradigm shift, etc.  Traditions are strong and flourish because people care about them and therefore continue to derive a lot of meaning from them.  At the same time, change is natural, powerful, and inevitable.  UROC is just one of many examples of change happening in the sport today.

And the race itself.  Anyone reading this has seen iRunFar’s and Karl Meltzer’s terrific previews.  Not much more to be said here other than to reiterate that actually picking a podium seems very difficult with the suspicion of late season fatigue and the ever so probable accompanying cold.  Inside Trail does suspect that this race could go be won be any number of dark horses (like a Jon Allen, Scott Gall, and Michael Owen), especially if some of the favorites are not 100%.   So, keep your eye on that.  And clarification of the 100k course reveals that some 37 miles appear to be either dirt or paved road.  Naturally, this may favor a runner like Mike Wardian and other marathoners with that kind of speed. Tis the season, late September, so we just hope that the runners are all there, feeling 100% and ready to rock and roll.

11 thoughts on “UROC: A Step in a New Direction

  1. If you read the course desciption [sic] 🙂 here: http://www.ultraroc.com/docs/descriptions/detail_course_desciption.pdf you and look to the key in the top right, it says 8 miles of pavement and 21 miles of Blue Ridge Parkway (which last time I was up there in May was pavement to). (I am sure this is where IT got the info so my ‘you’ is anybody else that is curious.) My guess is gravel and mountain roads are fire roads, packet dirt, etc. and not really analogous to running on pavement.

    My brother is running the 50k, will be interesting to hear his feedback. I’ll be doing the Hinson Lake 24 Hour Ultra in Rockingham, NC…the largest in the country with 300 runners. Mike Morton (former Western States winner who did 154 miles in 90F temps last year at Hinson) is on the registration list. So its a battle for second place on back if he shows. 😉

    Like

  2. I personally believe that a race like this has a place on the ultra calender, but as a mid packer I do not like its elitist image. Perhaps I am just jealous that I am not fast enough to be invited … anyway, recently I heard opinions (probably nothing new for others) that UROC is a step backwards with respect to gain recognition for the sport on more formal levels – i.e. IAAF and possibly Olympics. Which makes me wonder if all the effort put to UROC could not be better invested in promoting some already sanctioned event. Maybe Geoff an Co. tried this and as he says nobody was really interested … which to me seems hardly imaginable. But I would welcome some more ideas with this respect. This being said I do not see UROC as a step backwards, but rather sideways. Still better than doing nothing and just complaining, so kudos to the organizers for having guts to at least try this.

    Like

    • Vlad raises a very good point. Many trail ultrarunners are unhappy with USATF and have suggested creating some sort of alternate governing body for the sport in the US. I don’t think this is the solution, and feel that working with the USATF would be easier and much more productive. Just ask members of the US mountain or 100k teams for their opinions on how USATF manages their teams. On the international level, the IAU seems to be the IAAF in a functional sense. Their is already an international trail championship that actually has an international team competition and involves more than a handful of athletes from other countries. The structure is out there, I’m not sure why it is not being taken advantage of.

      Like

      • I, too, wonder about this oddity that is the non-existent governing body. USATF seems to sanction trail championships, but they’re more or less obscure. This weekend is a perfect example. IAU? What if North Face goes abroad, expanding the EC series?

        The difficulty might just be inherent to this whole “ultra” thing that seems so much more than just a race category. Fairly non-descript and I actually thought at some point recently that maybe UROY fits pretty well, a vague award for a vague sport. I’m not actually being critical. It just fits

        Like

      • The NF already sponsors some of the best trail ultras all over the world. The US series itself really does not offer anything. I think you did get some travel money to head to the championship race, but that was maybe a single year several years ago. While the San Fran race has a strong field, the international runners amount to a handful. It would also be just as big without the series. Are you suggesting we use a single corporation as an international governing body for trail ultras?

        While there can be great deal of variation in trail ultras, adding some national and international structure is really not that complicated. As with road ultras, you have national championships, some sort of selection process for national teams, and then world championships. There are governing bodies in place already, and ultra runners in many other countries have accepted this type of organization. Ask the few US runners that have been to IAU races about their experience, and how it compares to other large ultras in terms of funding, international competition, funding, and organization.

        A good parallel, and the reason why UROC exists, is the situation with the popular trail ultras in the US. Small fields, very expensive, no prize money, lotteries. Many RD’s don’t seem interested in doing the things necessary to promote competition at the front. When compared to other forms of running, the way some of the big races are run makes as much sense as ignoring the existence of current organizations.

        Ian Sharman commented that he was afraid that if ultrarunning continues to increase in popularity that we will see more lotteries. This is probably true, and also very strange that most of these events have no elite fields. The thousands of runners that don’t get into Boston, NY, London, etc. do not seem to mind that 30-40 spots are reserved for runners at the front. That’s what we have with the ultra trail races, our NYC and Chicago marathon fields are established by lottery.

        I don’t think a few races with elite fields are going to kill our sport, and with the lack of interest in this from the current races, UROC represents progress.

        Like

  3. So much being said out there, but there is so much room in the sport for a race like this. The credibility will sort itself out over time. It looks like a good mix of runners, so I am anxious to see how it plays out. Obviously not the best race for a dedicated mountain runner, but would a dedicated mountain runner really be that interested in competing in a race like this? I think there is so much interest in labeling who the best ultra runner, but it’s not that simple. There is so much timing involved that the UROY award is probably a more accurate way to tag who the standout runner is. One race certainly doesn’t reward the consistency of someone like Nick Clark, who put together one heck of a season this year. Even with someone like Dave Mackey, does one race make the man? He’s been crushing it for years.

    Either way, it’s generating interest. That’s a good thing. Good luck to all the competitors!

    Like

  4. It’s worth nothing that also this weekend also features the Vermont 50, an established that supports a great cause, Vermont Adaptive Ski and Sports. In rainy weather, the course becomes a full on mud bath. Good times. I’ll be headed there for fun, mud, beer, and to support the local community that was hit hard by the flooding caused by Hurricane Irene.

    Like

  5. I wish all the competitors the best, however, reviewing the list, As Karl put it on Sharman’s blog, there are more elites absent than present. Female field in particular is extremely weak, and of the ones who did plan to come, many are not. Although, of course, it is understandable that this is the first year event. And injuries and life happens and prevent athletes from coming to desired races. I also have to say, IMHO, I agree with Vlad and Ben that it would be better to work with a governing body for running in US that already exists than creating a new venue. Historically, USATF was not paying attention to neither long (ultra) distances nor much of trail races (or combination of thereof). However, lately, it had made an attempt to address that, and is drawing quite a few ultrarunners into their board of directors. I remember many moons (years) ago, when WS100 had become so difficult to get into by lottery, Karl had raised the question first about creating a 100M race that would invite everybody “who is who” and have a championship. At first, it sounded like a great idea. But there then the questions raised” we have RRCA and USATF championship in every distance, well, some don’t like those venues, but some will always not like one versus another (mountain, trail, road, flat, circles, point-to-point etc.) The separation will be taken even further. May be those races that have a fantastic attendance and a track of setting national records could consider working together with USATF and such and bring in the prize money and “name” UROC the person who wins. There are events like WS100, AR50, Masochist 50, Miwok 100k that are so competitive…will runners really think the one who won UROC is The Runner? In all, isn’t UROY a better and more descriptive title, when the person gets picked by a panel, over the course of a year, comparing the fields, distances, venues, competition, and so forth? So far, it had been doing a pretty darn good job naming The Ultrarunner. Do we really think one arbitrary race will tell us who is the best? It is not fare to compare it to marathons/other distances (not to mention other sports) because in a marathon, the setting is extremely similar between courses (road, a few hills, water stop every mile) versus variety of terrain, time and so on one goes through in a (longer) ultra race. May be that’s why a World Championship also adheres to venues that have requirement: certain amount of pavement, elevation change, circles…to eliminate the variations.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s